Published 19 Jun 2026, 09:31 UTC · fetched 14 Oct 2026, 10:57 UTC
K A L E O
@CryptoKaleo
Quoting · 6 Jun 2026, 19:41 UTC · context given to the AI
https://t.co/LrFnaTF9QzIn reply to · 19 Jun 2026, 07:49 UTC · context given to the AI
The way Saylor operates reminds me of infinite traders I've seen over the course of my career They win by taking massively outsized bets with high conviction, double, triple quadruple down and no matter who tells them to slow down and tighten their system up they will never do it And they usually get away with it for a while, sometimes even for a cycle or two But no matter what happens their addiction to that risk that they're taking, their addiction to the highscore will inevitably always make them come crashing down In my head if Saylor doesn't blow up this cycle because BTC bails him out he'll manage to do it next cycle He'll normalize the risk he took with STRC and find a way to take on even more risk His survival this time around will justify his behavior and make him think even higher of himself Man just seems addicted to a highscore, the same way so many traders I know, and they've all blown up@DonAlt Agreed 🤝 https://t.co/Gs1sF3r1J9View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction