Published 25 Jun 2026, 17:22 UTC · fetched 15 Oct 2026, 05:05 UTC
The Wolf Of All Streets
@scottmelker
In reply to · 25 Jun 2026, 15:35 UTC · context given to the AI
A record number of Bitcoin are now underwater, more than at any point in its entire history. The crowd is reading this as the death certificate. They have it exactly backwards, and two numbers printed in the same week prove it. Both facts are verified on-chain, both all-time highs, both happening right now. As Bitcoin broke below $59,100 this week, the amount of supply held at a loss climbed to 10.83 million coins, the most ever recorded, higher than at any previous bear-market bottom. At the very same moment, long-term holders pushed their total holdings to a record 14.8 million coins, roughly 75 percent of everything in circulation. Read separately, the first looks like capitulation and the second looks like conviction. Read together, they are not a contradiction. They are the answer. Because the question that actually matters is not how much Bitcoin is underwater. It is who is holding the underwater coins, and whether they are selling. And the data is unambiguous. A record share of supply is sitting at a loss, in the hands of the exact cohort that has held longest and sold least, and that cohort is not shrinking. It is growing to new highs while the losses mount. The pain is real. The pain is also frozen. Ten point eight million coins are underwater and simply not moving. That distinction is the whole game, and almost everyone misses it. A loss only matters to the market when it is sold, because the sale is what pushes price down and feeds the next leg. An unrealized loss held by someone with no intention of selling is not pressure. It is the opposite. It is supply quietly removed from the market and locked in a drawer. The more coins sitting at a loss in diamond hands, the less float remains to trade, and the thinner the layer of potential sellers gets. A record loss in the hands of the unshakeable is not the sound of a market breaking. It is the sound of a market running out of people willing to sell. The part the doom scrolling ignores is that this exact reading has happened before, and it has meant the same thing every time. Around 10.5 million Bitcoin held at a loss is the level the on-chain data touched near the cycle bottoms of 2019, near the bottom in 2020, and near the bottom in 2022. Every previous bear market. Without exception. The metric that the timeline is now waving around as proof Bitcoin is finished is the identical metric that has marked the floor in every prior cycle. The crowd has mistaken the bottom signal for the obituary. None of this guarantees the low is in, and honesty demands saying so. More than a third of even long-term holders are now underwater, and if enough of them finally break, the very supply that looks locked could unlock and the floor could fall further. That is the real risk, and it is genuine. But it is a risk about future behavior, not a verdict from the current data. What the data says today is specific. The selling that drove this drawdown came overwhelmingly from short-term holders and forced liquidations, not from the long-term base, and that base is still adding coins into the teeth of the decline. Underneath the headline, Bitcoin is not dying of a record loss. It is doing the thing it has done at the bottom of every cycle, transferring coins from weak hands at a loss into strong hands that refuse to sell, until there is almost no one left to force out. The record number of underwater coins is not evidence the conviction is gone. It is evidence of exactly how much conviction is being tested, and how little of it is breaking. The obituary writers are reading the right number and drawing the opposite conclusion. A record amount of Bitcoin is underwater, and the people holding it are buying more. That is not what the end looks like. It is what the floor has always looked like, right up until the moment everyone realizes it in hindsight.@shanaka86 @MustacheTommy You have written a few of those obituaries in the past 48 hours.View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction