Prediction evidence

correctPolicy v1.0

Source post

Published 29 Jun 2026, 17:33 UTC · fetched 15 Oct 2026, 05:05 UTC

🐧

@Pentosh1

In reply to · 29 Jun 2026, 17:30 UTC · context given to the AI

@Pentosh1 peng still hold the same view on sol from last week?

Has to flip $79 imo on HTF’s and confirm with a 3d+ 1W close. Then from I still think there are far better trades out there. Stocks are moving in many cases many many multiples. In general I think the risk in crypto isn’t worth the returns. And hasn’t been for some time. My view remains to be focused on equities until it stops working

View original on X ↗

How this was scored

Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result

Baseline: first SOL price at or after publication, $75.20 at 29 Jun 2026, 18:00 UTC.
Evaluation: price at the end of the 24 hours horizon, $73.06 at 30 Jun 2026, 18:00 UTC.
r = 73.06 / 75.2 − 1 = -2.85%
Direction d = −1 (bearish), so d × r = +2.85% against a neutral band of ±1.50% → correct

Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology

AI interpretation

Uses only text available at publication time

Asset: Solana (SOL)
Direction: ▼ Bearish
Intent: inferred
Horizon: 24 hours (default, none stated)
Evidence span: “Has to flip $79 imo on HTF’s and confirm with a 3d+ 1W close. Then from I still think there are far better trades out there. Stocks are moving in many cases many many multiples. In general I think the risk in crypto isn’t worth the returns. And hasn’t been for some time. My vi”
Confidence: 61%
Review state: auto accepted
Model / prompt: gpt-6-luna+decisions · decisions-v3

Prediction evidence

Source post

How this was scored

AI interpretation

Outcome record

Request a correction