Prediction evidence

incorrectPolicy v1.0

Source post

Published 4 Jul 2026, 12:07 UTC · fetched 21 Oct 2026, 12:57 UTC

Travladd 𐤊

@travladd

In reply to · 4 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC · context given to the AI

Bitcoin is attempting a breakout. Knocking on overhead resistance based on CTF Trailer and HTF Trailer, both of which are volatility based. Breakout is being rejected. Nothing bullish in this chart under $63k. Daily close above would lean slightly bullish. Big boss is $65.8k. https://t.co/kAhYPngzMk

@crypto_birb Likely goes to 66, maybe an overextended daily on that wick and then to new lows. Probably takes 2 weeks or so of chop to hit the high and then 3 weeks to the capitulation, what do you think?

View original on X ↗

How this was scored

Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result

Baseline: first BTC price at or after publication, $62,605 at 4 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC.
Evaluation: price at the end of the 30 days horizon, $62,617 at 3 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC.
r = 62617.34 / 62604.66 − 1 = +0.02%
Direction d = −1 (bearish), so d × r = -0.02% (neutral only if the price is unchanged) → incorrect

Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology

AI interpretation

Uses only text available at publication time

Asset: Bitcoin (BTC)
Direction: ▼ Bearish
Intent: explicit
Horizon: 30 days (stated in post)
Evidence span: “@crypto_birb Likely goes to 66, maybe an overextended daily on that wick and then to new lows. Probably takes 2 weeks or so of chop to hit the high and then 3 weeks to the capitulation, what do you think?”
Confidence: 98%
Review state: auto accepted
Model / prompt: gpt-6-luna+decisions · decisions-v3

Prediction evidence

Source post

How this was scored

AI interpretation

Outcome record

Request a correction