Skip to content

Home Arena Leaderboard Token sale

Loading…

Public calls. Verifiable outcomes.

Methodology Docs Privacy Terms & risk X ↗

Methodology Claim profile

Published scoresSign in with X

Leaderboard / @travladd / 2089690100787794428:memecoin:$EYE

Prediction evidence

incorrectPolicy v1.0

Source post

Published 18 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC · fetched 20 Oct 2026, 08:30 UTC

tr

Travladd 𐤊

@travladd

I bought $Z at around 700k today I bought $EYE at around 4.7M yesterday. First two diamond tokens on Ansem’s platform. Reason: risk to reward should be good. Both tokens had to pay $120,000+ to be diamond. So both clearly funded teams.

View original on X ↗

How this was scored

Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result

Baseline: first $EYE price at or after publication, $0.003896 at 18 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC.
Evaluation: price at the end of the 24 hours horizon, $0.002349 at 19 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC.
r = 0.002348586789672278 / 0.0038960767957410846 − 1 = -39.72%
Direction d = +1 (bullish), so d × r = -39.72% against a neutral band of ±5.00% → incorrect

Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology

AI interpretation

Uses only text available at publication time

Asset: Memecoins: $EYE ($EYE)
Direction: ▲ Bullish
Intent: inferred
Horizon: 24 hours (default, none stated)
Evidence span: “I bought $Z at around 700k today I bought $EYE at around 4.7M yesterday.”
Confidence: 63%
Review state: auto accepted
Model / prompt: gpt-6-luna+decisions · decisions-v3

Outcome record

Status

incorrect

Baseline price

$0.003896

Evaluation price

$0.002349

Move

-39.72%

Neutral threshold

±5.00%

Price provider

geckoterminal

Evaluated at

20 Oct 2026, 14:56 UTC

Policy version

v1.0

Request a correction

Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.

Sign in to request a correction