Loading…
Published 1 Sept 2026, 04:24 UTC · fetched 19 Oct 2026, 13:38 UTC
CrediBULL Crypto
@CredibleCrypto
In reply to · 1 Sept 2026, 04:19 UTC · context given to the AI
I remember FOMO'ing into ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 back in November/December 2021 specifically because @CredibleCrypto was so bullish on it. It was my first cycle (Obviously). "Staking" it was the key objective- and I did it - can't recall the exact details but this thing was projected for $10 and higher. Long story short - I ended up converting it to bitcoin:native at like a 95% loss. Tuition paid to the market - lessons learned the hard way. Fast forward - 5 years later - we are targeting $10 again. I'll keep my comments to myself around credible but the hate for this coin runs deep. But I will say - let's fucking go - send it to $10 - because if this dogshit gets to $10 - these markets going to be absolutely on fucking fire. So send it @CredibleCrypto - LFG.What might clear things up a bit and make more sense to you- the $10+ call back then is the same $10+ call now- in both cases the expectation was that it would be met after BTC topped somewhere above 100k+. Back in '21, when BTC corrected down to the 30-40k region, I expect that to be our bottom before 100k+, and had it been, CRV (along with the rest of the market) likely would have continued higher to those same targets. The BTC breakdown from 30-40k down to 15k though brough everything (including CRV) down with it- but the thesis hadn't changed. BTC was still expected to go to 100k+, sooner than expected, and I still expected CRV to hit those targets after BTC had topped above 100k+. Fast forward to today and BTC has broken 100k+, and while it hasn't yet topped imo, ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 is back on track to those same targets, based on the same thesis. Hopefully in the time in between you've managed to accumulate a bit more than you had before, as it's finally time for this bet to pay off in a big way imo.View original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Repeat call within an existing 24h episode
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Repeated same-asset, same-direction calls count once, anchored to the first eligible post
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction