Loading…
Published 8 Oct 2026, 11:17 UTC · fetched 20 Oct 2026, 08:28 UTC
threadguy
@notthreadguy
In reply to · 8 Oct 2026, 05:58 UTC · context given to the AI
U don’t want to be an “ai loser” story. Because an ai loser story will be sold aggressively for months (saas, accenture, chegg, etc) Justin’s tweet is the first mainstream viral bitcoin ai loser story. I don’t think he meant to but adds huge story drag to whole sector if ai math progress == bad for btc btc was previously consensus as quantum loser, but nobody cares about quantum yet, or a flows loser to ai bubble, with mixed impact This is quite direct, from credible source, on day of new math breakthroughs, and if memes bad imo (Discl long puts) 2d-2w)@based16z this is unfortunately a really good tweetView original on X ↗
Deterministic: the same prices and policy always give the same result
unscored Awaiting manual review
Only the end-of-horizon price counts. A brief move followed by a reversal is not a success. Read the methodology
Uses only text available at publication time
Think the interpretation or outcome is wrong? Sign in with X to request a correction, so reviewers know who is asking.
Sign in to request a correction