@CredibleCrypto · *Tweets are my opinion, not financial advice* All OFFICIAL platform links and content are ONLY found on my website below.
Coverage 15 Apr 2026 – 21 Oct 2026
Caller Score
64
Top 36% · #7 of 18 ranked
Scored calls
116
2 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
58.6%
68 correct / 48 incorrect · 0 neutral
Avg 24h return / call
+0.69%
Avg return per call (24 hour horizon)
Following every call
+80.1%
Equal stake on all 116 calls resolved in the last 90 days
Mean alpha
+0.37%
Return minus the same bet on BTC (BTC calls vs cash)
Each component is shrunk toward the cohort mean by sample size (k = 20) and ranked as a percentile among callers in this view; the weighted blend (66) orders the cohort, and the Caller Score is the position in it. 6% of these calls stated a timeframe.
| Component | Value | Percentile | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hit rateShare of directional calls that were right (neutral moves excluded) | 58.8% | 100 | 20% |
| Follow-the-calls drawdownWorst peak-to-trough of taking every call at equal stake (lower is better) | −31.9% | 41 | 15% |
| Mean alphaAverage return minus the same bet on BTC over the same period | +0.37% | 34 | 25% |
By month resolved · 24 hours horizon
254 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
“@Narddog99431301 Yes that would seem logical. Every other asset that has breached its prior ATH from years ago has rejected that initial retest and corrected (XRP, ETH, BTC).”
Think your calls are better?
Get ranked on the same rules, or challenge @CredibleCrypto head to head.
| ConsistencyShare of the window's weeks (days for short windows) with a scored call |
| 100.0% |
88 |
| 15% |
| Risk-adjusted returnMean alpha divided by the volatility of the assets called | 0.10 | 72 | 25% |
90 days · 24h
“@Narddog99431301 Yes that would seem logical. Every other asset that has breached its prior ATH from years ago has rejected that initial retest and corrected (XRP, ETH, BTC).”
“Overnight we pushed higher, and it's now clear that this is indeed, at the very least, a 5th (impulsive) subwave here. Which means there is a possibility that our low at .198 (start of the first LTF impulse labeled "1" here) marked both our low and HTF bottom. More soon. ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52”
“Overnight we pushed higher, and it's now clear that this is indeed, at the very least, a 5th (impulsive) subwave here. Which means there is a possibility that our low at .198 (start of the first LTF impulse labeled "1" here) marked both our low and HTF bottom. More soon. ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52”
“Beautiful reaction off of our flipped support zone- exactly what we wanted to see. Structurally it's too early to tell if this move up was the start of that 5th subwave we were looking for or possibly still part of a 4th subwave (running triangle or flat- snapshot on chart for reference). We will know more as PA develops, but great to see this reaction off the key level we wanted to see hold for continuation. ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52”
“Beautiful reaction off of our flipped support zone- exactly what we wanted to see. Structurally it's too early to tell if this move up was the start of that 5th subwave we were looking for or possibly still part of a 4th subwave (running triangle or flat- snapshot on chart for reference). We will know more as PA develops, but great to see this reaction off the key level we wanted to see hold for continuation. ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52”
“Now that we've reclaimed the bearish OB, we want to see it hold as support here. From a EW perspective, we have a 3 legged move up so far. We want this to ideally extend to a completed 5 wave impulse to suggest this move up may a part of a larger uptrend developing on the lower timeframes. ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52”
“Now that we've reclaimed the bearish OB, we want to see it hold as support here. From a EW perspective, we have a 3 legged move up so far. We want this to ideally extend to a completed 5 wave impulse to suggest this move up may a part of a larger uptrend developing on the lower timeframes. ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52”
“It is still possible to take advantage of sub $2 $CVX. I can't say how long that will remain the case though... https://t.co/Wg9uCg4V8S”
“Tight consolidation on $CRV here after a bullish SFP on the daily. Lots of liquidity to the upside. Looking for something like this. First key step is breaking above the bearish OB that led to our SFP. $CVX already working on a potential major reclaim itself so might be leading the way...”
“For those struggling with the math...that amounts to ~14% APR. When $CVX price is down, you get paid. When $CVX price is up, you get paid. Irrespective of market conditions, you get paid. I've been collecting this yield since 2021, consistently, without fail, regardless of price. And regardless of price, it has consistently ranged between 10-30% for the past 5 years. Obviously when the token is priced higher, the yield is nominally higher as well, so it only gets better as price rises- but even in market slumps, earning 10-20% APR consistently for this long is almost unheard of in this space. And most importantly, this yield doesn't come from $CVX token inflation- as that is essentially complete and the token is nearly fully circulating. A fully circulating token that pays out 10-30% yield consistently, trading 95% below it's prior ATH with a total marketcap of less than 200M. It's actually insane that some of you are gambling on bundled meme coins when something like this exists at this level of a discount...”
“$CVX still teasing this reclaim and what could very well be the start of a 100+% move to the upside... https://t.co/aQsNduBZXI https://t.co/jV506hbceM”
“Well when liquidity begins flowing back into the space, starting with majors (like $ETH) like it typically does, I think green candles on majors will bring the focus back onto the mainstream/major cryptos. The casino will still be running in the background but real/significant money flows coming from big players won't be going into the rigged memecoin casino, so attention will shift back to where the money IS going, which will be fundamentally sound projects (like on $ETH if ETH indeed does lead). And then as usual the "flavor of the day" memecoins that are pumping right now will deflate as they lose the monopoly on attention that they currently have and everyone left holding will lose, again.”
“Got an initial reaction off the LTF range lows from the prior post but wasn't enough to reach the local highs and so we came lower to seek our more liq. In the same way we have a series of unswept lows on $BTC and $ETH (resting liq below) we now have a series of unswept highs on $CRV (resting liq above) on lower timeframes as we approach HTF support/demand in GREEN. With $CRV still holding up at range lows against its $BTC, $ETH and $XRP pairings (as shared in prior posts) this is the exactly the time where we would want to see $CRV show strength against the weakness of majors like $BTC and $ETH, which could explain why CRV looks more primed for upside/relief (with liq resting above) while BTC and ETH look more primed for a further correction (liq resting below). Will be interesting to see if $CRV can show relative strength against our majors here...”
“Got an initial reaction off the LTF range lows from the prior post but wasn't enough to reach the local highs and so we came lower to seek our more liq. In the same way we have a series of unswept lows on $BTC and $ETH (resting liq below) we now have a series of unswept highs on $CRV (resting liq above) on lower timeframes as we approach HTF support/demand in GREEN. With $CRV still holding up at range lows against its $BTC, $ETH and $XRP pairings (as shared in prior posts) this is the exactly the time where we would want to see $CRV show strength against the weakness of majors like $BTC and $ETH, which could explain why CRV looks more primed for upside/relief (with liq resting above) while BTC and ETH look more primed for a further correction (liq resting below). Will be interesting to see if $CRV can show relative strength against our majors here...”