Loading…
@CredibleCrypto · *Tweets are my opinion, not financial advice* All OFFICIAL platform links and content are ONLY found on my website below.
Coverage 15 Apr 2026 – 20 Oct 2026
Caller Score
50
Top 50% · #11 of 22 ranked
Scored calls
174
0 pending · 1 unresolved
Hit rate
58.8%
50 correct / 35 incorrect · 89 neutral
Avg 24h return / call
+0.18%
Avg return per call (24 hour horizon)
Following every call
+31.8%
Equal stake on all 174 calls resolved so far
Mean alpha
+0.23%
Return minus the same bet on BTC (BTC calls vs cash)
Each component is shrunk toward the cohort mean by sample size (k = 20) and ranked as a percentile among callers in this view; the weighted blend (60) orders the cohort, and the Caller Score is the position in it. 6% of these calls stated a timeframe.
| Component | Value | Percentile | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hit rateShare of directional calls that were right (neutral moves excluded) | 59.3% | 97 | 20% |
| Follow-the-calls drawdownWorst peak-to-trough of taking every call at equal stake (lower is better) | −66.6% | 24 | 15% |
| Mean alphaAverage return minus the same bet on BTC over the same period | +0.23% | 48 | 25% |
By month resolved · 24 hours horizon
35 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
“I do think a LTF reversal is imminent- wouldn't mind a scenario like this in which $BTC holds a higher low while $ETH makes a marginally lower low on this current drive down before a reversal on both. $ETH showing more weakness here just as we expected and BTC with a much clearer path to new local highs into 90k+ vs $ETH which I think may struggle around the $2600-$2800 region. For now, let's see if we can get that reversal!”
| ConsistencyShare of the window's weeks (days for short windows) with a scored call |
| 96.3% |
82 |
| 15% |
| Risk-adjusted returnMean alpha divided by the volatility of the assets called | 0.06 | 52 | 25% |
All time · 24h
“Never got a second test of our resistance zone like I would have liked on lower TF's, but there you go, our "deeper" correction that I've been warning about seems to be underway. Many said this was a ridiculous expectation and were screaming that a pullback to these levels was impossible, and now that we got it will claim it's the end of the world, so I'm here to remind you again that this dip was logical, expected, and a healthy correction after what has been a significant rally off of the $1800 lows. This is technically a lower TF correction in the broader context of things and doesn't change the higher TF outlook one bit. Still ultimately looking for a sweep of those triple lows, but we are technically at local demand right now, so maybe some relief first. ethereum:native”
“I've talked about why I ignored your 1st subwave off the lows in prior vids and the rationale behind the 1-2 preference, but check this recent video regarding the current accumulation structure that argues for why our low may already be in before the next impulse: https://t.co/3MbWrD5o6n”
“Here we go, now send it straight to $3. ethereum:0x4e3fbd56cd56c3e72c1403e103b45db9da5b9d2b https://t.co/t9lwotnlW2 https://t.co/HzKrfcAwxE”
“Nice to see $CRV showing some strength against BTC/ETH on lower timeframes here as both BTC and ETH made new local lows over the last 5-6 hours but $CRV has avoided doing so as it sits in our demand/buy zone. Meanwhile even $CVX looks good here as it has fully retraced the last move up just to come back down and re-test the local demand formed by the base of our triple tap- which was previously front run. We have also left behind a number of untapped lower highs in the process. I think our reversal should be close,”
“Just barely missed our local highs on that last push up on $BTC before getting slammed back into our range. Still have the same expectations for both $BTC and $ETH for now. That is, looking for liquidity to be taken to the upside before a "larger" correction back down. This again is in context of the broader, higher TF outlook which is continuation of the larger uptrend to new all time highs after the "shakeout" that is being described here.”
“$CVX now attempting a reclaim of our local range lows after tapping our "bottom zone". If we can avoid a broader market pullback here then I think our low may be in and am targeting the local range highs and above that the first local resistance zone at $3+. https://t.co/igUkKMovSg https://t.co/5c513lWgDC”
“$ETH has now cleared the untapped highs and is approaching our key resistance zone between $2800-$3000. This supply zone is the most logical place to expect a rejection and potentially deeper pullback to target the equal lows below us. If we manage to clear this zone then we will probably leave those equal lows behind.”
“Meanwhile $BTC has swept higher TF lows but also left behind equal lows on LTF. Think we may take those if/when we take the triple lows on $ETH. Lots of liquidity still remaining on $BTC to the upside as well and that's the more significant draw atm imo. Like ETH would prefer to take the equal lows now as opposed to going for the highs first and leaving them behind (potentially for later).”
“We have left behind our equal lows on $ETH for now, and we now have triple untapped lows. Again, would prefer to take them before a move back up to the highs because if we don't and we move up in a corrective manner again the assumption is that we may come back down again for them later. Let's see how things develop- for now the chop continues within our range.”
“$BTC still holding our key region with lots of liq building up to the upside. Won't rule out a potential wick to our established range lows (blue range) but still think more upside (82k+) in the mid term makes the most sense here. https://t.co/YAVLlUMoYQ https://t.co/MBtleml664”
“I've added to my ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 longs here based on the video shared below. New invalidation is now at the .29 lows. Everything explained below 👇 https://t.co/iyBnpUI2xb”
“Also worth noting that "running flats" like the one we had on ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 for our 2nd subwave (quoted tweet) are a testament to the bullishness of an asset that is mid-impulse. Momentum is strong enough that we fail to take the lows of what is supposed to be "ranging PA" leaving us with the characteristic structure that you see on a "running" flat. Here are two examples that instantly came to mind- back when bitcoin:native had the first major impulse (subwave 1) of the higher TF cycle that began in 2017. Our rally from 3k to 14k gave us two clear running flats on the way up, with barely any pullbacks of significant until we had completed this 1st five wave move to the upside.”
“Also worth noting that "running flats" like the one we had on ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 for our 2nd subwave (quoted tweet) are a testament to the bullishness of an asset that is mid-impulse. Momentum is strong enough that we fail to take the lows of what is supposed to be "ranging PA" leaving us with the characteristic structure that you see on a "running" flat. Here are two examples that instantly came to mind- back when bitcoin:native had the first major impulse (subwave 1) of the higher TF cycle that began in 2017. Our rally from 3k to 14k gave us two clear running flats on the way up, with barely any pullbacks of significant until we had completed this 1st five wave move to the upside.”
“All the OI added on from the rise from .25 completed nuked and funding which was climbing aggressively fully reset. Onwards. ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 https://t.co/Rl5Ph38efs https://t.co/TsNso566Dj”