Loading…
@CredibleCrypto · *Tweets are my opinion, not financial advice* All OFFICIAL platform links and content are ONLY found on my website below.
Coverage 15 Apr 2026 – 20 Oct 2026
Caller Score
64
Top 36% · #7 of 18 ranked
Scored calls
115
0 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
59.1%
68 correct / 47 incorrect · 0 neutral
Avg 4h return / call
+0.17%
Avg return per call (4 hour horizon)
Following every call
+19.8%
Equal stake on all 115 calls resolved in the last 90 days
Mean alpha
+0.10%
Return minus the same bet on BTC (BTC calls vs cash)
Each component is shrunk toward the cohort mean by sample size (k = 20) and ranked as a percentile among callers in this view; the weighted blend (61) orders the cohort, and the Caller Score is the position in it. 6% of these calls stated a timeframe.
| Component | Value | Percentile | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hit rateShare of directional calls that were right (neutral moves excluded) | 58.0% | 91 | 20% |
| Follow-the-calls drawdownWorst peak-to-trough of taking every call at equal stake (lower is better) | −11.1% | 75 | 15% |
| Mean alphaAverage return minus the same bet on BTC over the same period | +0.10% | 31 | 25% |
By month resolved · 4 hours horizon
247 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
“Starting to look more likely that we may just front-run our lows...seeing some LTF absorption into these local lows here, may be setting up for another LTF triple tap to send it back in the opposite direction... ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 https://t.co/MDFbQH9i9X https://t.co/1XX99AZlfa”
| ConsistencyShare of the window's weeks (days for short windows) with a scored call |
| 100.0% |
88 |
| 15% |
| Risk-adjusted returnMean alpha divided by the volatility of the assets called | 0.06 | 44 | 25% |
90 days · 4h
“Starting to look more likely that we may just front-run our lows...seeing some LTF absorption into these local lows here, may be setting up for another LTF triple tap to send it back in the opposite direction... ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 https://t.co/MDFbQH9i9X https://t.co/1XX99AZlfa”
“20k+* Explained why here three weeks ago when it was trading at $1500 and everyone was saying it was dead again- still not too late to watch and prepare yourself: Why Ethereum Is Headed to $20,000+ https://t.co/L3ReXNqSV1 https://t.co/qzuGPbGst4”
“People have seen stuff like this happen less than two years ago and then still somehow confidently state that coins like $CVX (which has been paying out a consistent 10-30% APR since inception over 4 years ago and has zero inflation at this point) will never see a new all time high again. For context, a 12B marketcap on $CVX puts it at triple digits (my target), over 2x prior ATH.”
“$ETH has held up very well over the last 10 days, keeping even the most bullish scenario in play here. Impressive to say the least :) https://t.co/nFBgUvdT8Z”
“@lunanomacrypto @CurveFinance Did Bitcoin look bullish at 3k when it crashed from 20k to 3k? Did it look bullish at 15k when it crashed from 65k? I could go on and on- the charts always look “bad” to most at bottoms. I’ve already shared how this is a massive HTF accumulation bottom on my other posts.”
“Bumped his subscription fee from $20/month to $200/month overnight with over 800 subs on auto-renew. That will bring in a little under $2M/year in X subscription fees alone. Sure he can’t sell the $ANSEM tokens he holds himself (at least not publicly) but thanks to everyone pouring their money into it he has millions dollars (in tokens that everyone else paid to bid up in value) to “give away” while monetizing all the hype and attention that those airdrops are driving to him, to the tune of millions of dollars a year. The catch 22 is that the source of all the attention and influence- the 50 something percent of token supply that he still controls- is finite, and with every airdrop and giveaway used to amplify attention to the token he 1. further depletes that % of supply that he controls and 2. increases the float/sell pressure in the short term. The argument for higher prices on the token is directly correlated to the amount of supply he controls- which is ever dwindling- and because it’s already valued in the tens of millions, it is also not easily replenished (unless number go up). Even if he is able to launch a business/drive value to the token to the tune of millions of dollars per year, that won’t be able to offset the decrease in value of his supply due to a falling token price, and as the token falls, he’ll need to relinquish more of the supply via airdrops/giveaways to continue to keep people talking about it. In other words, when the price of the token is rising- all is well in $ANSEM world and “everyone” wins. But if price starts falling…well then the one thing that can make it reverse course (more attention) requires Ansem to relinquish more of the one thing holding it all together- his control of the token supply. In the end, just like most memes, a few will win and many will lose. Except in this case- regardless of the fate of the $ANSEM token- one individual will walk away with millions, thanks to all the attention and hype that was driven to him along the way under the premise of “reviving the trenches”.”