Loading…
@rektcapital · Crypto Investor/Analyst Writes RC Newsletter: https://t.co/pFp14Jbs2r Follow for level-headed insights on Bitcoin and Altcoins
Coverage 15 Apr 2026 – 20 Oct 2026
Caller Score
—
Low sample: 2 more calls to rank
Scored calls
13
0 pending · 0 unresolved
Hit rate
50.0%
2 correct / 2 incorrect · 9 neutral
Avg 1h return / call
+0.05%
Avg return per call (1 hour horizon)
Following every call
+0.6%
Equal stake on all 13 calls resolved in the last 30 days
Mean alpha
+0.09%
Return minus the same bet on BTC (BTC calls vs cash)
Each component is shrunk toward the cohort mean by sample size (k = 20) and ranked as a percentile among callers in this view; the weighted blend (78) orders the cohort, and the Caller Score is the position in it. 31% of these calls stated a timeframe.
| Component | Value | Percentile | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hit rateShare of directional calls that were right (neutral moves excluded) | 67.8% | 92 | 20% |
| Follow-the-calls drawdownWorst peak-to-trough of taking every call at equal stake (lower is better) | −0.9% | 100 | 15% |
| Mean alphaAverage return minus the same bet on BTC over the same period | +0.09% | 58 | 25% |
By month resolved · 1 hour horizon
31 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
“#BTC There's the invalidation, though no picture-perfect reclaim of~$78300 back into support took place Instead, price resembled more of a fake-breakdown below ~$78300 But because price did not bearish retest ~$78300, the bear case for additional downside was not validated Now, price is trying to position itself for a reclaim of ~$82200 into support $BTC #Bitcoin”
| ConsistencyShare of the window's weeks (days for short windows) with a scored call |
| 100.0% |
73 |
| 15% |
| Risk-adjusted returnMean alpha divided by the volatility of the assets called | 0.20 | 77 | 25% |
30 days · 1h