Loading…
@CredibleCrypto · *Tweets are my opinion, not financial advice* All OFFICIAL platform links and content are ONLY found on my website below.
Coverage 15 Apr 2026 – 20 Oct 2026
Caller Score
60
Top 41% · #9 of 21 ranked
Scored calls
139
35 pending · 1 unresolved
Hit rate
61.2%
85 correct / 54 incorrect · 0 neutral
Avg 30d return / call
+3.05%
Avg return per call (30 day horizon)
Following every call
+423.3%
Equal stake on all 139 calls resolved so far
Mean alpha
+2.00%
Return minus the same bet on BTC (BTC calls vs cash)
Each component is shrunk toward the cohort mean by sample size (k = 20) and ranked as a percentile among callers in this view; the weighted blend (65) orders the cohort, and the Caller Score is the position in it. 7% of these calls stated a timeframe.
| Component | Value | Percentile | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hit rateShare of directional calls that were right (neutral moves excluded) | 62.7% | 73 | 20% |
| Follow-the-calls drawdownWorst peak-to-trough of taking every call at equal stake (lower is better) | −265.0% | 27 | 15% |
| Mean alphaAverage return minus the same bet on BTC over the same period | +2.00% | 61 | 25% |
By month resolved · 30 days horizon
364 records · every scored call links to its source post and price evidence
“We are retesting our historically significant .328 level on LTF here after a LTF reclaim. Ideally we can get another push up to take the resting liq into .36 before a potential pullback (into another higher low). ethereum:0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 https://t.co/OoNjbvltEJ https://t.co/d1Sh46bBNO”
| ConsistencyShare of the window's weeks (days for short windows) with a scored call |
| 95.7% |
82 |
| 15% |
| Risk-adjusted returnMean alpha divided by the volatility of the assets called | 0.10 | 76 | 25% |
All time · 30d
“@Shaks2t Nope not at all. Before a massive rally it’s typical to get these longer sideways corrections (see BTC at 24-25k).”
“Meanwhile $BTC has swept higher TF lows but also left behind equal lows on LTF. Think we may take those if/when we take the triple lows on $ETH. Lots of liquidity still remaining on $BTC to the upside as well and that's the more significant draw atm imo. Like ETH would prefer to take the equal lows now as opposed to going for the highs first and leaving them behind (potentially for later).”
“Meanwhile $BTC has swept higher TF lows but also left behind equal lows on LTF. Think we may take those if/when we take the triple lows on $ETH. Lots of liquidity still remaining on $BTC to the upside as well and that's the more significant draw atm imo. Like ETH would prefer to take the equal lows now as opposed to going for the highs first and leaving them behind (potentially for later).”
“We have left behind our equal lows on $ETH for now, and we now have triple untapped lows. Again, would prefer to take them before a move back up to the highs because if we don't and we move up in a corrective manner again the assumption is that we may come back down again for them later. Let's see how things develop- for now the chop continues within our range.”
“$CVX has hit our "bottom zone". https://t.co/qpbQ96lbf1 https://t.co/asnecT4x4W”
“For the same reason I charted XRP against ETH and caught that 200+% outperformance earlier (https://t.co/oJ2VNuo47O). Basically in the same way we compare CRV to BTC we can also compare it to ETH and XRP as they are the other two main "majors" that have the most bullish macro/HTF/impulsive structures.”
“For the same reason I charted XRP against ETH and caught that 200+% outperformance earlier (https://t.co/oJ2VNuo47O). Basically in the same way we compare CRV to BTC we can also compare it to ETH and XRP as they are the other two main "majors" that have the most bullish macro/HTF/impulsive structures.”
“Don't miss the forest for the trees. Bottom on $BTC is somewhere between where we are now and about 10% lower before a 200+% rally to the upside. If you want more context and/or want to hear the logic and rationale behind this statement I explained it all in depth in my last Youtube video which you can watch here: https://t.co/CaBepyzVwx”
“We got an initial, decent reaction off of our local demand zone on $ETH but it failed to produce a higher high and the subsequent move back down broke our local demand zone. On the bright side, if we take our "equal lows" now (which seems likely), it means the next time we pump to the upside it may be more sustainable as liq to the downside will have already been taken. Essentially rather than taking the highs and potentially pushing to 2800+ before our "larger dip" we may just be getting the "larger dip" out of the way now. Let's see if we can officially take those equal (well now triple) lows and then watch to see how PA develops from there.”
“An update on $CVX since so many keep asking- we took the lows that I wanted to see taken but it's still possible we will see a wick into the green demand zone below before our bottom is found- all explained about 5 days ago as well. https://t.co/x0Apo9NThV https://t.co/IdyXSmNoVH”
“Longed some bitcoin:native here based on the idea shared in the quoted post below. https://t.co/0rgWCdqD1C https://t.co/bS1OnFxSyO”
“Cleaned up the chart a bit. We reached our "wick zone" from the last post, got a nice reaction, but bled back down. Now we seem to have formed a nice little base here and liquidity continues to pile up to the upside and into our range highs. bitcoin:native https://t.co/3XhMAo564W https://t.co/X8GTP8saOe”
“Solid reaction off of our key zone thus far. Now send it all higher. ethereum:native https://t.co/TTLCtxgEt4 https://t.co/4D2VZQfCdt”
“Yup 💯 In fact most of you holding fundamentally sound, bottomed out alts will have outperformed BTC holders (who have an average cost basis of 20-30k BTC) by the end of this cycle. https://t.co/DLq3yYWccz”